The effect of starting point placement technique on thoracic transverse process strength: an ex vivo biomechanical study

Archie Digital Collections

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brown, Barrett S
dc.contributor.author McIff, Terence E
dc.contributor.author Glattes, Rudolph C
dc.contributor.author Burton, Douglas C
dc.contributor.author Asher, Marc A
dc.date.accessioned 2010-10-12T17:06:45Z
dc.date.available 2010-10-12T17:06:45Z
dc.date.issued 2010-07-13
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-5-14
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2271/880
dc.description.abstract Abstract Background The use of thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity, trauma, and tumor reconstruction is becoming more common. Unsuccessful screw placement may require salvage techniques utilizing transverse process hooks. The effect of different starting point placement techniques on the strength of the transverse process has not previously been reported. The purpose of this paper is to determine the biomechanical properties of the thoracic transverse process following various pedicle screw starting point placement techniques. Methods Forty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae from T2 to T9 were disarticulated and matched by bone mineral density (BMD) and transverse process (TP) cross-sectional area. Specimens were randomized to one of four groups: A, control, and three others based on thoracic pedicle screw placement technique; B, straightforward; C, funnel; and D, in-out-in. Initial cortical bone removal for pedicle screw placement was made using a burr at the location on the transverse process or transverse process-laminar junction as published in the original description of each technique. The transverse process was tested measuring load-to-failure simulating a hook in compression mode. Analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the data. Results Technique was a significant predictor of load-to-failure (P = 0.0007). The least squares mean (LS mean) load-to-failure of group A (control) was 377 N, group B (straightforward) 355 N, group C (funnel) 229 N, and group D (in-out-in) 301 N. Significant differences were noted between groups A and C, A and D, B and C, and C and D. BMD (0.925 g/cm2 [range, 0.624-1.301 g/cm2]) was also a significant predictor of load-to-failure, for all specimens grouped together (P < 0.0001) and for each technique (P < 0.05). Level and side tested were not found to significantly correlate with load-to-failure. Conclusions The residual coronal plane compressive strength of the thoracic transverse process is dependent upon the screw starting point placement technique. The funnel technique significantly weakens transverse processes as compared to the straightforward technique, which does not significantly weaken the transverse process. It is also dependent upon bone mineral density, and low failure loads even in some control specimens suggest limited usefulness of the transverse process for axial compression loading in the osteoporotic thoracic spine.
dc.title The effect of starting point placement technique on thoracic transverse process strength: an ex vivo biomechanical study
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2010-07-27T13:55:55Z
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.rights.holder Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Archie


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Sword Copy

Statistics